IS IT WORTH THE RISK?

Is it?…

As with any industry, there will always be challenges and risks with taking a brand social.  To not take a brand social would also be risk considering how many consumers rely on social media/search and mobile applications.  “Many companies are just now starting to take a serious look at the benefits of social media in business, and they are looking even more closely at the risks involved, such as fraud, theft, defamation, cyberbullying and invasion of privacy among others” (Social media and its associated risks, 2011).

This brings me to an example about Kraft. Since they are in the food industry, do you remember seeing on Facebook the video that went viral about Kraft cheese not melting? If you haven’t watched the video, STOP. Watch this video and continue to read…

kraft Video

Now, that you have watched the video, this is an example of how a product and brand can be destroyed within hours.  Because this video went viral, anyone that had a social media account was able to see this video.  Can I also add that I was also one of the people on Facebook to SHARE this video and I now do not eat Kraft. Period.

Kraft then created a YouTube account called ThanksforAsking to make up for the cheese video, but Is this too late?  Take note – Kraft also made sure they disabled the comment box.

Kraft Experts?

Food companies face increased risks from social media because they still do not have developed policies for tools such as Twitter and Facebook, according to the law firm Roythorne.  More on this article here.

Another challenge to this is the food being bought in the grocery stores cannot be tracked. Meaning, if Sally from Kansas finds mold in her Childs Capri sun, Capri Sun will not see this until it is viral. The brand also runs the risk of no longer being sold in certain stores due to the issues that occur.

Not taking a risk or going social means a brand could fall behind. Without repetition or promotion, how can a brand really exist? I understand that it is new so it is hard for a brand to take the risk, but it’s probably a bigger risk to NOT try social media.

Surprisingly, a brand that doesn’t use social media or traditional marketing is Trader Joes.  According to  Mark Gardiner,  a previous employee and marketer writes: Over half a million people have liked the unofficial Trader Joe’s Fan page on Facebook, and if you enter “Trader Joe’s” as a search term on Pinterest you’ll come to a page that you can never really see, because new pics are being pinned faster than you can scroll. (OK, that’s a slight exaggeration, but you get my point.) No wonder some devil’s advocates ask: Why should Trader Joe’s bother with social, since the company’s fans already do a fine job of spreading the word, sparing it the expense of hiring another manager?

Trader Joes uses face-to-face interaction and they pride themselves on being extra friendly and personable. Meaning, they make their environment so people enjoy going in to socialize with the employees that work there.

Check out more on Trader Joes here!

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “IS IT WORTH THE RISK?

  1. I remember when this video came out. At first, I was disgusted by how the cheese did not melt and would not want that lingering in my stomach but, then I started to do some research. Under a direct flame as shown in the video, most cheeses actually do not melt. I actually tried this at home with different cheeses but, the everlasting impression was left on Kraft being the cheese the did not melt. Great Post!

    Like

  2. Hi Jessica,

    I always enjoy reading your blog. Love your subject matter, for one thing, but I also appreciate the interesting food spin you put on the SM topic du jour.

    In your latest post, I thought it was a great tactic to get us to watch the Kraft video. I had never seen this video, but I can totally see why it went viral — especially in these health-conscious times. (Judging from these experiments, there’s not much difference between Kraft American cheese and the plastic it’s wrapped in!) And I have to agree, Kraft’s comeback was weak. Coupled with the fact that they disabled the comment box, it makes them look like they’re hiding something — and only reinforces their image as a corporate behemoth.

    Trader Joe’s, on the other hand, avoids the perils and pitfalls of going social by not using social media at all. Antisocial or brilliant business strategy? Or both?

    All in all, great examples of the relative risks of taking a brand social. Nicely done, as always!

    -Betty

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s